Open the matter, draft a grounded demand letter, and bill it, in one pass.
DemandDesk runs the whole demand end to end, it opens the matter, clears the conflict, grounds the demand in the actual caselaw and statute (not invented citations), sets the leverage, drafts the letter section by section at the severity you pick, works out the recipient's response deadline, and raises the invoice. The letter is a draft for you to send, and the money step waits for you to say go.
Draft a grounded demand letter See a sample demand
THE PROBLEM
The demand letter is the document a litigator sends most, and it is also the one that eats an afternoon. You open the matter in one system, run the conflict check in another, dig for the controlling law by hand (or worse, let a chatbot invent a citation that gets you sanctioned), draft the thing from a stale template, do the deadline math in your head, and then go raise the invoice in a fourth tool. Or you hand a junior a template-fill and hope. The auto-demand tools that promised to fix this got burned for firing ungrounded legal threats with no lawyer in the loop, which is exactly the reputation you cannot afford. So most demands are still slow, or thin, or both.
HOW IT WORKS
You give it the matter, the client, the party on the other side, the jurisdiction, and the tone you want. DemandDesk runs the same SCE engine the rest of your practice runs on, in order: it opens the matter (Chancery) and the client (Atrium), clears the conflict against the opposing party (Themis, and if there is a conflict it stops, it does not draft around it), grounds the demand in real caselaw and statute (Codex), sets the strategy and leverage (Solon), drafts the letter section by section at the severity you chose (Quill), computes the recipient's response deadline (Argus), and raises the invoice (Ledger). The letter comes back as a draft for you to read and send. The invoice is money, so it sits behind your approval and never goes out on its own.
WHAT YOU GET
For each demand: - the matter and client opened in your own book, not a throwaway, - the conflict cleared first, with a hard stop if the other party trips it, - a demand grounded in real caselaw and statute, searched and cited, not made up, - the letter drafted section by section at the severity you chose (courtesy, firm, final), - the recipient's response deadline computed from the send, so you are not doing calendar math, - an invoice ready to raise, held behind your approval because it is money, - every outward and money step gated, the letter is a draft you send, nothing auto-fires.
WHO IT'S FOR
Solo and small-firm litigators and collections attorneys who send demand letters often and want intake, conflict, grounding, drafting, deadline, and billing in one supervised pass instead of seven. Also legal-ops and in-house counsel handling routine demands, unpaid invoices, breach, cease-and-desist. If you are not a lawyer and you want to auto-send legal demands with no attorney review, this is not that, DemandDesk drafts and computes, a human lawyer reviews and sends, and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise.
PRICING
Prices are hypotheses we are still validating, not commitments, and every paid step is confirmed before it runs. - Per letter, one grounded demand end to end, intake through a ready invoice, a draft for you to send. - Practice (a monthly seat for a solo or small firm), unlimited demands plus the shared SCE matter, client, and ledger spine, so DemandDesk feeds the same book the rest of the practice runs on. - Firm, team seats and the full SCE legal suite (Solo Practice OS, CiteGuard, LedgerGuard) attached, value-metered.
The invoice step is money, so it is gated and confirmed before it fires, always. Nothing bills silently.
THE PROOF (dogfood)
We run DemandDesk on ourselves before we ask you to. AYA gets owed money like any vendor, a pilot or a consulting invoice goes unpaid, and when it does we open the matter in our own SCE spine, clear conflicts, ground the demand in the actual controlling law, draft the letter at a firm but courteous severity, compute the response deadline, and raise the follow-up invoice, on the exact pattern we sell. And the build itself left a receipt, the deliverable pattern was scored by our quality gate (87 out of 100, a passing grade) and every one of the nine atoms it composes was verified on disk before this page was written, which is the same discipline the SCE paid tools sell.
HONEST NOTE
We would rather under-promise. What is true today, the desk is built, it composes nine existing verified SCE capabilities (matter, client, conflict, caselaw and statute search, strategy, drafting, deadline, invoice), all nine references resolve on disk, and it passed the quality score. What is NOT true yet, it has not run live, no booted system, no live drafting model, no real invoice raised, and the demand-letter template and tone taxonomy still have to be authored as their own data overlay before a real letter comes out shaped right. The first real run is one AYA demand letter, drafted end to end, with the invoice held at approval. That is a credentials and data step, not a missing-capability step, and we will tell you which one we are on rather than imply a proof we have not run. One more honest line, the claim that it is grounded in real caselaw has to be backed by a witnessed run before we publish it as fact, and until then we frame it as what the engine does, not as a result we have already shown.
Draft a grounded demand letter
*This page is a specification. The capability it describes is not built yet, and nothing here is a claim that it runs today.*